Shiv Sena will abstain from the Motion

 

 

In an interesting turn of events, Shiv Sena MPs have decided not to attend the Lok Sabha on Friday where a debate on no-confidence motion against the Narendra Modi government is underway and a voting will be taken up later in the day.

This comes as a huge setback for the BJP, a day after it almost seemed to have garnered the support of the warring NDA ally.

Earlier on Thursday, Shiv Sena had issued a whip to its MPs to be present and vote in favour of the government.

“We will support the BJP. A formal announcement may be made by this evening,” a source close to Shiv Sena chief Uddhav Thackeray had said.

Hours after issuing the whip, the Sena shifted its stance and said party chief Uddhav Thackeray had asked his party MPs to remain in Delhi and a final decision on supporting the Modi government would be taken on Friday morning before the debate started.

As of Thursday, in the 545-member (including the Speaker) Lok Sabha, the NDA had 311 members, including 273 of the BJP, four of SAD, 18 of Shiv Sena, six of LJP, three of RLSP, two of JD-U, two of Apna Dal, and one each of All India N R Congress, SDF and NDPP.

Following Friday’s development, the BJP will lose 18 MPs of Shiv Sena taking the number down to 293.

However, the no-confidence motion moved by the Opposition does not pose a threat to the government as NDA enjoys absolute majority in the House. The majority mark is 268.

Meanwhile, the Biju Janata Dal (BJD) members walked out of the Lok Sabha on Friday as the House began its debate on a no-confidence motion against the government.

On the first day of the Monsoon Session, Lok Sabha Speaker Sumitra Mahajan had admitted the motion moved by the Opposition including the Congress and former BJP ally TDP.

TDP chief N Chandrababu Naidu had sought the support of other parties for the motion, citing the NDA government’s “non-fulfilment of the promise” in granting special status to his state.

Apart from TDP, the notice of no-confidence had also been given by members of the Congress, NCP, RSP and CPI-M. AIMIM member Asaduddin Owaisi.

Top leaders of the BJP and the Opposition, including Congress president Rahul Gandhi, will take part in the debate that will conclude with a reply from Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

बीजू जनता दल ने सदन के शुरू होने से पहिले ही सदन का बहिष्कार किया

बीजू जनता दल ने सदन के शुरू होने से पहिले ही सदन का बहिष्कार किया

अविश्वास प्रस्ताव मे वक्ताओं के बोलने का समय निर्धारित

आंध्रप्रदेश के लिए विशेष राज्य का दर्जा मांग रहे तेलुगु देशम पार्टी (TDP) ने  एनडीए सरकार के खिलाफ अविश्वास प्रस्ताव लेकर आई और इसे मंजूरी भी मिल गई है. शुक्रवार 20 जुलाई को बहस का दिन तय किया गया है.

बहस के लिए सबसे ज्यादा वक्त बीजेपी को मिला है. मोदी सरकार के खिलाफ टीडीपी अविश्वास प्रस्ताव लेकर आई है. चर्चा के लिए टीडीपी को 13 मिनट का वक्त मिला है. कांग्रेस और AIADMK को 38-38 मिनट का वक्त दिया गया है. समाजवादी पार्टी को सिर्फ 6 मिनट का वक्त दिया गया है.

पार्टी                     चर्चा के लिए वक्त

BJP                     3.33 घंटा

CONGRESS       38 मिनट

SP                       6 मिनट

AIADMK              38 मिनट

37 IAS officers of 1986 Batch impaneled for Secy or equivalent post

 

The NaMo administration on Thursday announced the empanelment of 35 IAS officers (1986 batch) to hold Secretary and Secretary Equivalent posts in Government of India. As many as 20 officers were empanelled to hold Secretary rank post whereas 16 were empanelled to hold Secretary equivalent level posts.

IAS officers empaneled to hold Secretary level posts are;

  • Ravi Mittal (BH)
  • Guruprasad Mohapatra (GJ)
  • P D vaghela (GJ)
  • Anil Kumar Khachi (HP)
  • Rajni Sekhri Sibal (HY)
  • Sanjeev Kaushal (HY)
  • Rakesh Kumar Gupta (JK)
  • Subhash Chandra (KN)
  • Vandita Sharma (KN)
  • Khastrapati Shivaji (MH)
  • Pramod Kumar Das (MP)
  • S P Singh Parihar (MP)
  • G V Venugopala Sarma (OR)
  • Utpal Kumar Singh (UD)
  • Alok Tandon (UP)
  • Umesh Sinha (UP)
  • Anshu Prakash (UT)
  • Sanjiv Nandan Sahai (UT)
  • R S Shukla (WB)
  • I S N Prasad (KN)

IAS officers empaneled to hold Secretary or Secretary Equivalent level posts are;

  • Atul Chaturvedi (AM)
  • Ravi Capoor (AM)
  • Sanjiva Kumar (AM)
  • Alok Vardhan Chaturvedi (BH)
  • Sangeeta Singh (GJ)
  • Suresh Kumar (JK)
  • P H Kurian (KL)
  • Bijay Kumar (MH)
  • Jayashree Mukherjee (MH)
  • J Suresh Babu (MN)
  • Shambhu Singh (MN)
  • Yaduvendra Mathur (RJ)
  • Balvinder Singh Bhullar (UP)
  • Mukul Singhal (UP)
  • Manoj Kumar Parida (UT)
  • Satbir Bedi (UT)

Chidamabaram Chargesheeted

curtsy thenewsminute


The CBI has accused Chidambaram of abuse of power, alleging that he flouted norms to grant a Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB) clearance. 

Already under the shield of Suereme Court he is confident enough to rebuke the charges


New Delhi: Former finance minister P Chidambaram and his son Karti have been named as accused by the Central Bureau of Investigation in the Aircel Maxis money laundering case.

The investigative agency filed a supplementary chargesheet in the case in the Patiala House court on Thursday, over a month after the Enforcement Directorate submitted its chargesheet.

The CBI has accused Chidambaram of abuse of power, alleging that he flouted norms to grant Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB) clearance to firm M/S Global Communication Holding Services Ltd for investment in Aircel.

This is the first time that the senior Congress leader has been directly accused of wrongdoing in the case. The ED had also named him at several places in its chargesheet but had not arrayed him as an accused.

In a tweet, the veteran Congress leader alleged that the CBI has been pressured to file the chargesheet by the BJP government at the centre.

“CBI has been pressured to file a charge sheet to support a preposterous allegation against me and officers with a sterling reputation. The case is now before the Hon’ble Court and it will be contested vigorously. I shall make no more public comment,” he wrote.

Apart from Chidambaram and his son, the CBI has named nine public servants as well as officials of Aircel Maxis. The court will take cognizance of the chargesheet on July 31.

According to the CBI, Mauritius-based Global Communication Services Holdings – a subsidiary of Maxis – sought approval for an investment of US dollars 800 million in telecom firm Aircel.

The approval should have come from the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs, which is headed by the Prime Minister. But it came from the finance ministry, which was then headed by Chidambaram. The finance ministry is only empowered to approve investments of sums up to Rs 600 crore.

The CBI alleged that after the approval was received, Aircel Televentures Limited paid Rs 26 lakh to a company linked to Karti Chidambaram. In September last year, the ED had attached assets worth Rs 1.16 crore belonging to him and a firm allegedly linked to him in connection with this case.

Chidambaram has already been protected from arrest by the court till August 7, as the court extended his anticipatory bail for the third time a few days ago. He has denied all the charges, and called the case against him a witch-hunt and a mixture of conjecture and falsehoods.

हामीद अंसारी की परेशानी जोशी की जुबानी

 

नई दिल्ली. संघ और भाजपा से जुड़े रहे पूर्व प्रचारक संजय विनायक जोशी फिर से जोश में आ गए हैं. अचानक उन्होंने एक ब्लॉग लिखकर अपने तेवर दिखा दिए हैं. यूं तो उन्होंने पूर्व उप-राष्ट्रपति हामिद अंसारी पर निशाना साधा है लेकिन सीधे तौर पर उनके निशाने पर भारत ही नहीं दुनियां भर के मुसलमान और इस्लाम तो है ही, उनकी तरफदारी करने वाले लोग भी हैं. इस ब्लॉग को उनकी फौरी प्रतिक्रिया के तौर पर देखा जाए या भविष्य का कोई संकेत, ये तो आने वाले वक्त में ही पता चलेगा, लेकिन उनके तेवर काफी सख्त हैं.

जोशी बिना लाग लपेट के सीधे हामिद अंसारी पर सवाल उठाते हुए लिखते हैं कि, ‘हाल ही में पूर्व उपराष्ट्रपति हामिद अंसारी ने कहा था कि देश के मुस्लिमों में बेचैनी का अहसास और असुरक्षा की भावना है. अभी-अभी आ रही एक बेहद सनसनीखेज खबर से साबित हो गया है कि आखिर हामिद अंसारी जैसे लोगों में असुरक्षा की भावना क्यों पनप रही है. खबर है कि उत्तराखंड में मदरसों में पढ़ने वाले करीब 2 लाख मुस्लिम बच्चे रातों-रात गायब हो गए हैं’. दरअसल उन्होंने व्यंग्यात्मक लहजे में आधार लिकिंग के बाद उत्तराखंड में वजीफों में आई कमी को हामिद अंसारी के बयान से जोड़ दिया है.

वो आगे लिखते हैं, ‘ये तो अकेले उत्तराखंड का मामला है, अब आप खुद ही समझ सकते हैं कि जब सीएम योगी आदित्यनाथ ने उत्तर प्रदेश में मदरसों को अपना रजिस्ट्रेशन करवाने को कहा तो क्यों इतना हंगामा खड़ा कर दिया गया. इस बात से साबित हो गया है कि बीजेपी की सरकार आने के बाद से मुस्लिम खुद को क्यों असुरक्षित महसूस कर रहे हैं’. वजीफे के मुद्दे पर ही नहीं वो मदरसों को और भी बातों के लिए निशाने पर लेते हैं, ‘उत्तर प्रदेश में तो और भी काफी कुछ चल रहा है. सरकारी पैसों की लूट वहां भी ऐसे ही की जा रही है, साथ ही खुफिया एजेंसियों ने ये भी अलर्ट दिया है कि कई मदरसों में बच्चों को कट्टरपंथी शिक्षा भी दी जा रही है. इस तरह की गड़बड़ियों को देखते हुए सीएम योगी ने सभी मदरसों का रजिस्ट्रेशन जरूरी कर दिया है. राज्य में कई मदरसे बिना रजिस्ट्रेशन के चल रहे हैं, उन्हें फंड कहाँ से आता है, इसकी किसी को कोई जानकारी तक नहीं है.इन मदरसों में क्या पढ़ाया जा रहा है, इस पर भी सरकार का कोई नियंत्रण नहीं होता. जबकि ऐसे छात्रों को लगातार अल्पसंख्यक कल्याण योजनाओं के तहत तमाम फायदे मिलते रहते हैं.’.

हामिद अंसारी पर निशाना साधते हुए संजय जोशी लिखते हैं, ‘उत्तर प्रदेश सरकार राज्य में चल रहे लगभग 800 मदरसों पर प्रतिवर्ष 4000करोड़ रुपये खर्च करती है. मगर हैरत की बात है कि इसका एक बड़ा हिस्सा छात्रों तक पहुंचने की जगह उन लोगों की जेब में जा रहा है, जिन्हें लेकर हामिद अंसारी जैसे लोग परेशान हो रहे हैं’. मदरसों के बाद वो अपने ब्लॉग में इंटरनेशनल लेवल पर हो रही घटनाओं को इस्लाम से जोड़ देते हैं, ‘वैसे देखा जाय तो पाकिस्तान में मुसलमानों को कौन मार रहा है ? अफगानिस्तान में मुसलमानों को कौन मार रहा है? सीरिया में मुसलमानों की हत्या कौन कर रहा है? यमन में मुसलमानों को कौन मार रहा है? इराक में मुसलमानों को कौन मार रहा है? लीबिया में मुसलमानों की हत्या कौन कर रहा है? कौन है जो मिस्र में मुसलमानों को मार रहा है? जो सोमालिया में मुसलमानों को मार रहा है? बलूचिस्तान में भी मुसलमानों को मार रहा है? अब मैं सोच रहा हूँ जब ये सभी देश इस्लामिक हैं… तब शान्ति कहाँ है? मैं इस्लाम पर सवाल नहीं कर रहा हूँ, क्योंकि सभी लोग जानते हैं की इस्लाम एक शांतिपूर्ण धर्म है… लेकिन शांति रहस्यमय रूप से से गायब है….!! अफगानिस्तान, इराक, सीरिया, लेबनान, यमन और मिस्र को किसने बर्बाद किया है ? या वहां दंगा करने के लिए कौन जिम्मेदार हैं ?’.

लग रहा है कि संजय जोशी इस्लाम से जुड़े एक एक पहलू पर लिखने के मूड में थे, वो देश की बात भी करते हैं और उसके ‘गद्दारों’ की भी, ‘अजीब विडम्बना है , कुछ गद्दारों के लियें यहाँ इशरत बेटी है, कन्हैया बेटा है, दाऊद भाई है, अफजल गुरू है, लेकिन भारत माता नहीं !आखिर…ऐसा क्यों है……..’.

वो आगे लिखते हैं, ‘अब थोड़ा और ध्यान दीजिए…मुस्लिम + हिन्दू = समस्या, मुस्लिम + बौद्ध =समस्या, मुस्लिम + ईसाई = समस्या, मुस्लिम + सिख = समस्या, मुस्लिम + नास्तिक = समस्या, मुस्लिम + मुस्लिम =बहुत बड़ी समस्या! उदाहरण देखिए, हां-जहां मुस्लिम बहुसंख्यक है, वहाँ वे सुखी नहीं रहते हैं और न दूसरे को रहने देते हैं!

देखिए …मुस्लिम सुखी नहीं, गाजा में मुस्लिम सुखी नहीं ,म्हलचज में मुस्लिम सुखी नहीं, लीबिया में मुस्लिम सुखी नहीं ,मोरोक्को में मुस्लिम सुखी नहीं, ईरान में मुस्लिम सुखी नहीं, ईराक में मुस्लिम सूखी नहीं, यमन में मुस्लिम सुखी नहीं, अफगानिस्तान में मुस्लिम सुखी नहीं, किस्तान में मुस्लिम सुखी नहीं ,सीरिया में मुस्लिम सुखी नहीं ,लेबनान में मुस्लिम सुखी नहीं ,नाइजीरिया में मुस्लिम सुखी नहीं ,केन्या में मुस्लिम सुखी नहीं सूडान में ,अब गौर कीजिए ………! मुस्लिम सुखी वहां हैं, जहाँ कम संख्या में है…? मुस्लिम सुखी है आस्ट्रेलिया में, मुस्लिम सुखी है इंग्लैंड में, मुस्लिम सुखी है बेल्जियम में, मुस्लिम सुखी है फ्रांस में, मुस्लिम सुखी है इटली में, मुस्लिम सुखी है जर्मनी में, मुस्लिम सुखी है स्वीडन में, मुस्लिम सुखी है कनाडा में, मुस्लिम सुखी है भारत में, मुस्लिम सुखी है नार्वे में, मुस्लिम सुखी है नेपाल में, क्योंकि यहां जेहाद के नाम पर सब कुछ संभव हैं.

आखिरी लाइन वो उस विषय पर लिखते हैं जोकि उनके ब्लॉग का टाइटल है, ‘आतंकवादी का मजहब क्या होता है?’. वो लिखते हैं, ‘मुसलमान हर उस देश में सुखी है ! जो इस्लामिक देश नही है ……..और देखिये कि वो उन्हीं देशो को दोषी ठहराते है जो इस्लामिक नहीं हैं….! या जहां मुस्लिमो की लीडरशिप नही है…..! मुस्लिम हमेशा उन देशो को ब्लेम करते है जहां वे सुखी हैं…….! और मुस्लिम उन देशों को बदलना चाहते हैं….. जहां वे सुखी हैं ! और बदल कर वे उन देशों की तरह कर देना चाहते हैं! जहां वे सुखी नही हैं……..!और अंत तक वो इसके लिए लड़ाई करते हैं….! और इसको ही बोलते हैं..आदि और भी हैं ऐसे ही इस्लामिक जेहादी आतंकवादी संगठन! अब इतना तो आप सभी, जरूर समझ गए होंगे कि……आतंकवादी का मजहब क्या होता है…..?’

संजय जोशी अपने आप को बीजेपी का सदस्य कहते हैं, ये अलग बात है कि बीजेपी उन्हें आधिकारिक रूप से कही नहीं बुलाती. अब ऐसे में उनका ये ‘मुस्लिम विरोधी’ ब्लॉग विवादों में आता है, या उन्हीं की तरह गुमनामी में जाएगा, वक्त ही बताएगा.

Mangal Pandey ‘The Lone Runner’


The chapters of India’s independence chapter began to be written in true sense in 1857 but it is said that the rebel of the rebellion against Angaji’s rule was played by the soldier with one of them. The aura of that soldier was such that when the forerunners ordered the other soldiers to confront him, they all retreated and the turn of martyrdom turned out to be the executioners refused to hang him.


The chapters of India’s independence chapter began to be written in true sense in 1857 but it is said that the rebel of the rebellion against Angaji’s rule was played by the soldier with one of them. The aura of that soldier was such that when the forerunners ordered the other soldiers to confront him, they all retreated and the turn of martyrdom turned out to be the executioners refused to hang him. Perhaps that Indian soldier was a warrior of independence. He was none other than Mangal Pandey, born in 1827 in a Sarayuparan Brahmin family in Nagawa, a small village in Ballia, Uttar Pradesh. Today (July 19th) is the birth anniversary of Mangal Pandey. Pandey was admitted to the army of East India Company at the age of 22 as a constable. He was a soldier of the East India Company’s 34th Bengal Infantry. In the memory of Mangal Pandey, the Government of India issued a stamp in 1984. Films and dramas have become their life. Historians have different opinions about Mangal Pandey’s revolt.

One of the historians wrote that rumors of Indian soldier being killed by the European soldiers for making and opposing Indian soldiers forcibly terrorized Mangal Pandey and on 29 March 1857, in the drunken cannabis, Had rebelled against the rule. Some historians said that due to the rebellion he became an enfield gun, in which the cartridge had to be cut off by teeth. When the soldiers came to know that the outer shell of the cartridge was made of cow and pig fat to save the seal, Mangal Pandey had raised the voice against it. English historian Kim E. Wagner wrote in his book “The Great Fear of 1857 – Rumors, Conspiracy and Making of the Indian Unmissing”, “Knowing the fear of the sepoys, Major General J. B. Heyersi, on the Hindustani soldiers It was quite rumored to have called the assault as rumor, but it is quite possible that the heresy was able to spoil the situation by confirming the rumors reached to the soldiers. The soldiers who were terrorized by Major General’s speech were also Mangal Pandey of the 34th Bengal Native Infantry. “

British historian Rosie Lilvelan Jones has also presented some similar arguments in his book “The Great Upcoming In India 1857 – 58 Untold Stories, Indian and British”. According to these historians, Mangal Pandey fired at Sergeant Major James Hewison but he survived. This incident has been told by the hand of Sheikh Paltu. During the conflict, when the lieutenant Benpade Bag reached the spot, Pandey shot him, but the target missed, Bagh also fired on Pandey with his pistol, he did not even target. If the British officers asked the soldiers to capture Mangal Pandey, all the chase was withdrawn. Paltu tried to overcome Pandey.According to Jones, when Paltu told the jamadar Ishwari Pandey that he sent four soldiers to capture Mangal Pandey, Ishwari Prasad had told Paltu a gun and said that if Mangal does not let Pandey escape then he will shoot him.

According to Jones, Mangal Pandey has cursed his colleagues and said that “you people have provoked me and now you are not with me”, and many pedestrians, including the cavalry, come towards him, Pandey has put a gun in his chest with his chest The trigger was pressed by thumb but he was saved. On April 8, 1857, Pandey was executed by the hangers of Kolkata on refusal by local hangers.

Ishwar Prasad was also hanged after Mangal Pandey. This spark of rebellion imposed by Mangal Pandey is not extinguished again. After a month, on May 10, 1857, a revolt was started in Meerut Cantonment and after seeing this fire took the whole of North India into its grip. It is said that the British had imposed 34,735 laws on Indian revolt with the rebellion so that no one like Mangal Pandey could retain his head again.

……. और कारवां गुज़र गया

 

 जन्म 04 जनवरी 1924
 निधन 19 जुलाई 2018
 उपनाम नीरज
 जन्म स्थान पुरावली, इटावा, उत्तर प्रदेश, भारत
 कुछ प्रमुख कृतियाँ
दर्द दिया है, प्राण गीत, आसावरीगीत जो गाए नहीं, बादर बरस गयो, दो गीत, नदी किनारे, नीरज की गीतीकाएँ, नीरज की पाती, लहर पुकारे, मुक्तकी, गीत-अगीत, विभावरी, संघर्ष, अंतरध्वनी,बादलों से सलाम लेता हूँकुछ दोहे नीरज के कारवां गुजर गया
 विविध
2007 में पद्म भूषण सहित अनेकप्रतिष्ठित सम्मान और पुरस्कार से सम्मानित

Arif Mohammad Khan’s statement valid till date

A piece of news has barely scratched the surface of our consciousness. It involves a powerful and influential local cleric from Bareilly’s Dargah Aala Hazrat seminary issuing a fatwa against a woman, asking locals and the faithful to ostracize her. Nida Khan, according to the cleric, has committed a “grave crime”. A victim of ‘triple talaq’, Nida had the temerity to campaign against the practice of instant divorce in Indian Muslim communities.

Congress president Rahul Gandhi. PTI

What makes Nida’s “crime” even “greater” is that she runs an NGO in Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, through which the courageous crusader supports Muslim women — a voiceless, marginalised group on the fringes of community space — who have been victimised by triple talaq or ‘nikah halala’ (the custom that dictates that a divorced couple can remarry only if the woman marries another man, consummates her new marriage and then proceeds to divorce).

According to a nation wide survey involving over 4,700 married Muslim women across 10 states conducted by Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan (BMMA) — a women’s rights organisation that has been at the forefront of the fight against triple talaq, polygamy and nikah halala — more than 90 percent respondents want the ritual of instant divorce and polygamy to be banned in India. The survey also showed that 88 percent Muslim women favour divorce through “talaq-e-ahsan” — a practice spread over three months and involving negotiation.

In a landmark ruling in April last year, a five-judge bench of the Supreme Court had set aside the Hanafi tradition of triple talaq as a “manifestly arbitrary” practice not covered by Article 25 (freedom of religion) of the Constitution. In delivering the judgment, justice Rohinton Fali Nariman had observed that it is “not possible for the court to fold its hands when petitioners (Muslim women) come to court for justice,” according to a report in The Hindu.

For Nida’s “crime”, however, cleric Mufti Afzaal Razvi wrote in the fatwa: “If Hinda (Nida Khan) does not apologise, she should be boycotted. Nobody should talk or greet her and people should stop eating with her, should not visit her if she is taken ill and if she dies, they should not read her last prayer or let her be buried in a graveyard,” reported Times of India which claimed to possess a copy of the “fatwa’.

The newspaper report also mentions that Nida suffered a miscarriage after allegedly being beaten by her husband in 2015 and she was eventually divorced by her husband through triple talaq a year later. The fatwa forbids Muslims from meeting her. It says: “Any person, including her family and triple talaq victims, who will meet her and do not follow Sharia decision, will stand at the same position as Nida.”

It doesn’t end here.According to a report by ABP News, the Bareilly cleric “ostracized” Nida and another woman — Farhat Naqvi, who happens to be the sister of Union Minister Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi and also runs an organisation to support Muslim women — for daring to raise their voices against triple talaq. The fiery Nida has dismissed the ‘fatwa’ and slammed the All India Muslim Personal Law Board — the self-styled gatekeepers of shariah law. “We don’t accept the AIMPLB but Islam, which came to us 1400 years ago. We will continue fighting for our daughters. These people have always subjugated women but now the time has changed,” the report quoted her, as saying.

The saddest part is, for campaigning against a practice deemed unconstitutional by the Supreme Court and considered un-Islamic in several Muslim-majority nations, Nida has been extended police protection.

There has hardly been any voice in Nida’s support. The self-righteous Left, which has huge similarities with Islamism in its way of controlling the thoughts and actions of its followers and prioritization of group identity over individual rights, is expectedly looking the other way. The liberals are silent because hounding of Muslim women by clerics doesn’t fit into its majoritarian narrative.


The Congress, whose president recently proclaimed himself as the “eraser” of hatred and fear and announced that he stands with the “exploited, marginalised and the persecuted”, is trying his best to scuttle the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Bill, 2017, so that it doesn’t turn into a law. Introduced by the NDA government after Supreme Court set aside the practice of ‘triple talaq’, the bill seeks to make it easier for Muslim women to approach the law seeking subsistence allowance and custody of minor children. It declares instant divorce as “illegal” and “void”.

The Bill has been passed in Lok Sabha, where the BJP has a majority. It is stuck in the Upper House because the Opposition wants to send it to a “select committee” for “closer scrutiny”. In reality, it is a delaying tactic by the Congress-led Opposition which has been caught in a no man’s land. The Opposition is non-committal and desperate to buy time because it doesn’t want to be seen coming out against a legislation that seeks to address legitimate grievances of Muslim women. On the other hand, it is wary of backing the Bill and courting the ire of the powerful mullahs’ club.

If Rahul Gandhi was truly the fellow traveler of the “exploited, marginalised and the persecuted”, he would have led Congress in unconditionally backing the triple talaq Bill and undoing his father Rajiv Gandhi’s historic blunder who — in order to appease male Muslim leaders — used his brute majority in Parliament to overturn a Supreme Court verdict in 1986 and deny Shah Bano Begum, a poor, septuagenarian, divorced Muslim woman her alimony.

On Congress’ decision to block the triple talaq Bill in Rajya Sabha, former Union minister Arif Mohammad Khan who resigned from the Rajiv Gandhi cabinet in protest against the decision to overturn the Shah Bano verdict, had this to say to India Today: “The Congress party is acting at the behest of Muslim Personal law board, the way its members have congratulated Congress is a testimony to this and it is a very unfortunate situation… Congress party doesn’t care about victims and individuals, but those who promise vote bank, like the Muslim personal law board.”

What the fatwa against Nida and the fate of triple talaq Bill tells us is that the fate of real minorities — such as Muslim women — remains endangered in India because the political system is unable to help them and the civil society finds it easier to indulge in pop activism than tackle uncomfortable realities and lived experiences.

Hashtag campaigns such as #TalkToAMuslim dominate social media — championed by the likes of actor and globally acclaimed public intellectual Swara Bhasker — that are condescending (if well-meaning), reductive and serve to alienate Muslims further through an exclusive focus on religious identities. Instead of such bubblegum activism in echo chambers, it might be worthwhile listening to the voices of courageous Muslim women in India who are still being persecuted for resisting obscurantist practices propagated by misogynistic men. Talk to them.

Another chance for Modi to exhibit his oration skills

The promptness shown by Lok Sabha Speaker Sumitra Mahajan in admitting the no confidence motion against the Centre  and the Narendra Modi government showing even greater promptness in holding this debate Friday—only two days after Parliament opened for its Monsoon Session—stumped the Opposition, which had been making noises over the issue since a washed-out latter half of the Budget Session.

File image of prime minister Narendra Modi.

It has become the subject of much debate as to why the ruling BJP leadership acted with this kind of alacrity from the word go in the Monsoon Session. More so, when it didn’t take cognisance of such attempts earlier, remained non-committal, and used all kinds of stalling tactics in last session.

Firstpost spoke to senior BJP leaders to get a few reasons why the ruling party acted this way:

First, although the Congress, its allies and those friendly to its cause, were rooting for a no-confidence motion against the Modi government, they were not in a hurry to have it debated on floor of the House. They were aware that once the issue was debated and voted, they wouldn’t have anything else to cling to against the government in this session.

This is the monsoon season: Heavy rain may bring down the temperature in some parts, but the run-up to the four Assembly elections—Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Rajasthan and Mizoram—have made political conditions too hot to bear. The BJP and the Congress are pitted head-to-head in these states and the outcome of these Assembly elections could potentially set the tone for 2019 parliamentary elections. The Congress and its allies would like this Monsoon Session to be stormy.

Consider the proceedings of the House on Wednesday when the Speaker accepted the no-confidence motion. Mallikarjun Kharge, leader of Congress party in Lok Sabha, and Trinamool Congress leader Saugata Roy urged the Speaker to fix a date within 10 days for debate and vote on the no-confidence motion.

This clearly indicated they were not particularly keen to have it immediately. Remember, this session only has 18 working days, of which three are on Friday, a day usually reserved for private member business.

Second, by accepting the motion and putting it on within three days of Parliament opening, the BJP wishes to expose the Opposition, particularly Congress president Rahul Gandhi. In April, the Congress president said if he is allowed to give “a speech for 15 minutes” then Modi would not be able to stand in Parliament. Effectively meaning that the Congress president, through his oratory, would vanquish Modi, so much so that he would run away from Parliament. Rahul earlier said the government was not letting him speak in Parliament because if he speaks there would be an “earthquake”. BJP Rajya Sabha MP and media cell chief Anil Baluni said, “Rahul must speak. Let that earthquake come, if he is able to cause it.”

Third, Sonia Gandhi on Wednesday said: “Who says we don’t have numbers?” (to topple the Modi government). The last time she made such a statement was in 1999 after meeting President KR Narayanan at Rashtrapati Bhavan when she asserted: “We have 272 and we hope to get more”. She didn’t have the numbers. Even this time around, the Congress is on a hopelessly weak footing in terms of numbers.

BJP leaders have already started mocking Sonia’s statement. Parliamentary affairs minister Ananth Kumar said, “Sonia is very weak in mathematics and thus can’t calculate the numbers. She got it wrong in 1999 and she is getting it wrong this time.”

Fourth, in a House whose strength is 534 seats (10 vacancies) excluding the Speaker, the TDP, which is moving the motion has 16 MPs. The Congress, the largest party supporting the motion has 48 seats. To defeat the Modi government on floor of the House, the Congress would need the support of 268 members, present and voting. The BJP has 273 seats.

Fifth, prompt acceptance of no-confidence motion denied the Congress a chance to move the motion and initiate the debate Friday morning.  The earliest any member of Congress could speak under the circumstances is at number three on the Speaker’s list, and within allocated time. Usually, the leader who opens the debate sets the agenda for the day. The Congress’ name would not be on the record and it is usually the lead speaker who has the luxury of time. Though Congress’ Mallikarjun Kharge was among the eight leaders who submitted notices for no-confidence motion to the Speaker, TDP leader K Srinivas beat them all to it.

Sixth, the BJP may use the no-confidence motion as an occasion to send the message that the so-called Opposition unity is not a reality. The fact that eight different leaders from different Opposition parties filed notices for no-confidence indicates that either the coordination among Opposition parties was lacking or each party was trying to prove a point against the other.

Seventh, if the BJP succeeds in getting a number higher than 314 (NDA’s strength in Lok Sabha), that would be a huge talking point against the Opposition in the upcoming days. AIADMK has already said it would not vote for the Opposition-sponsored motion and would vote for the government. AIADMK has 37 MPs.

Eighth, by deciding to have a debate on Friday, the government sought to kill any pretext for the Opposition to disrupt the proceedings of the House. The government has to get several important Bills including Triple Talaq, those on Goods and Services Tax (GST), ratification of Governor’s Rule in Jammu and Kashmir and passage of those all-important six Bills which would replace ordinances. These include Fugitive Economic Offenders Bill, Criminal Law (Amendment) Bill which introduces death penalty for rape of minors below 12, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Bill, and Commercial Courts (Amendment) Bill, 2018.

Fugitive Economic Offenders Bill aims to confiscate the property of those that have fled the country to avoid facing prosecution for economic offences. The Fugitive Economic Offenders Bill, 2018, was introduced in Lok Sabha in March 2018. Subsequently, an Ordinance was promulgated on 21 April, 2018. The Criminal Law (Amendment) Bill increases the punishment for rape of women, and introduces death penalty for rape of minor girls below the age of 12. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Amendment) Bill aims to address existing challenges in the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.

Ninth, the no-confidence motion gives an opportunity to the government to claim that it is not afraid of any issue raised by the Opposition.

Tenth, and most important, it allows Modi, the master orator and communicator, to take the floor of Parliament when an overwhelming number of Indians in all parts of the country would be listening intently. It would be an occasion to list the achievements of his government, take on Rahul and rest of Opposition leaders in his characteristic style: Mixing substance and rhetoric and unveil new expressions which would be talked about for ages. Friday would be the time for the rock star speaker in Modi to rise. Till date, he has not disappointed his supporters and sympathisers.